Thu, 21 August 2008
Went a bit longer this time- but had some good feedback and lots of interesting news this week!*Promo: Pieces Podfiction *Thursdays... yeah that works better. *How I plan to start shaping young minds... *The Podcast Wins Another Peer Award! *Headlines from all over the place: - Democracy Now - Consumerist - AZ Central - AZ Central again - Reuters - AP *Commentary from Glen Ford of BAR *Feedback! - Nobilis tells me exactly "When". - LA Times blog entry - AZ Central article about increase in Independent voters - OMG! It's Barely! And he's agreeing with me! - Daryl from Atomic Suburbia has a question for the Seekers. - Would we still have gone to Iraq had Gore become President? *Matthew Ebel takes us Downtown email: tsdiva AT gmail DOT com voicemail: 206-337-1026
Comments[1]
|
-
The question posed was, \"would Gore have gone to war with Iraq?\". That was the question but it also had a supposition attached,OIL. I would like to think that Gore would be above common thief. If the real reason wasn\'t the list of lies, such as, liberate a people, remove a tyrant, bring democracy to Iraq, find weapons of mass destruction, then the real reason has to be of criminal nature then. I was once asked the question myself, \"how would have Gore handled the Iraq war\". I immediately filed the question under something assumed, and answered politely, \"there wouldn\'t have been one\". Gore didn\'t have the agenda. The Bush can did. Bush even after all this time has yet to come to the table with a reason. The only real reason, should the caller be correct, is indeed a criminal one. In my view, attacking a sovereign land for a commodity that is theirs truly is criminal, and it makes the House, the Senate and virtually all of us, limousine drivers, if you get my drift. -=t=-
Post your comment:
